Summary
This video explains the historical context and perceived mechanisms behind UCC filings, framing them as a remedy for alleged fraud by the United States government. It posits that through various legislative acts and amendments since the Civil War, the government created a system where citizens unknowingly surrendered ownership of their property and implicitly became sureties for national debts. The UCC filing is presented as a way for individuals to reclaim ownership and discharge debts by establishing their security interest in assets that were allegedly converted into constructive trusts by the government.
Key Insights
UCC filings establish value on bonds, allowing the creation of promissory notes against that value.
The purpose of filing a UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) is to establish a value on a bond, enabling the creation of promissory notes based on that bond's value. The UCC-1 financing statement is used for this purpose.
The national debt is owed to the American people, representing the value of their registered property.
The national debt is not money owed to government officials but rather to the owners of registered property – the American people. A $30 trillion debt represents what is owed to Americans.
Filing a UCC financing statement establishes a superior claim over the 'artificial entity' or public person.
After learning the law, the 'quasi-owner' can file a UCC financing statement, supported by a security agreement, registering their security interest against the artificial entity (e.g., 'JOHN HENRY DOE', all caps) created by the state. This act is presented as reclaiming ownership from the state's paper title.
Sections
Historical Context of US Government Expansion and Debt
The US government's jurisdiction and debt increased around the Civil War, with limited land initially confined to a 10-mile square in D.C.
During the war between the United States and the Southern states, the United States was developing plans to increase its jurisdiction. This was necessary due to existing debt, a small population ('subjects'), and limited land assets such as the District of Columbia (10 miles square) and areas for forts, magazines, and arsenals.
Legislation between the 1860s and early 1900s shifted banking and taxing mechanisms, influenced by English powers.
Between the 1860s and early 1900s, banking and taxation methods underwent significant changes through legislation. Individuals closely associated with English powers exerted considerable influence over these US laws. Although these laws did not directly apply to the states or their people, the distinction was not clearly made by legislators, placing the onus on citizens to understand the relationship between the US government and its passed laws.
Early admiralty courts had limited jurisdiction, with the public understanding court boundaries.
In earlier times, admiralty courts interpreted legislation less broadly. The public understood when courts exceeded their jurisdiction, and citizens were in control because they knew their identity and their position relative to the United States corporation.
The 14th Amendment in 1868 created a new class of 'United States citizens' distinct from state citizenship.
In 1913, the United States added numerous private laws, facilitating an increase in its 'subjects'. This included provisions for the newly freed slaves from the Civil War to be considered property of the United States. The 14th Amendment in 1868 established a new class of citizens, 'United States citizens', which had not been formally recognized before. Previously, individuals were citizens of individual states, and United States citizenship was a consequence of state citizenship. Post-Civil War, this new class emerged, initially positioned in Washington D.C., with the American people and republics in the states having the option to benefit from this new United States citizenship by choice.
The 15th Amendment (1870) granted voting rights to new citizens, requiring them to register various life events.
The new class of citizens was given the privilege to vote in the democracy starting in 1870 with the 15th Amendment. These new citizens (subjects) were required to apply for marriage licenses, register to vote, and record births and deaths. While this new citizenship came with benefits, it also brought duties, responsibilities, and liabilities regulated by the D.C. legislature.
Edward Mandell House is credited with outlining a plan to subtly enslave Americans through voluntary participation.
Edward Mandell House is attributed with providing a detailed outline of the plan to implement the enslavement of the American people. The 13th Amendment in 1865 ostensibly allowed people to voluntarily enter into a state of 'slavery' by accepting benefits offered by the United States. Whether House actually spoke these words is considered irrelevant, as the described scenario has allegedly been implemented.
The Federal Reserve Act (1913) established central banking, and the 16th Amendment enabled taxation for currency control.
Central banking for the United States was legislated with the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. The ability to decrease currency in circulation through taxation was legislated with the 16th Amendment in 1913.
The 17th Amendment (1913) facilitated voluntary participation in the US democracy, supporting presumptive control.
Support for the presumption that the American people had volunteered to participate in the United States democracy was legislated with the 17th Amendment in 1913.
The American Bar Association (1917) created a path for British Crown control over courts.
The path for control of courts by the British Crown was established with the creation of the American Bar Association, which is presented as the 'British Accreditation Registry' (BAR), in 1917.
The Trading with the Enemy Act (1917) and emergency powers allowed the US to suspend constitutional limitations.
In 1917, the United States legislature passed the Trading with the Enemy Act and emergency war powers legislation. This opened the door for the United States to suspend constitutional limitations, even during peacetime. Declared emergencies served as sufficient authority for US officers to exceed peacetime powers and implement laws benefiting the US treasury.
Government-declared emergencies grant US officers authority to implement laws beyond peacetime powers.
There is always a declared emergency in the United States, but it only applies to their subjects. These subjects, or employees, are the only ones that can be dictated to or mandated.
In the 1920s, birth registrations became mandatory, turning children into federal property.
During the 1920s, states accelerated the push for mothers to register births, first demanded for the new federal property (formerly enslaved Black people). People were not paying attention to government actions. The stock market crash served as a diversion.
1930s federal legislation required birth certificate applications for government workers' paid maternity leave.
In the 1930s, federal legislation provided for the registration of babies through application for birth certificates, allowing government workers to receive paid maternity leave. This push for registration is framed as a surrender of ownership.
Registration of property, including cars and land, constitutes a surrender of ownership to the state.
The key word in 'registration' is 'regis', implying monarchy and patriarchy. Registration of property, such as cars (via title applications) and land (via deed or trust registration), effectively turns ownership over to the state. This created a secret constructive trust, into which people unknowingly walked by participating in the US democracy, thereby agreeing to be sureties for US debts.
The Great Depression diverted attention while programs like Social Security invited voluntary participation as charities.
The Great Depression served as a diversion, keeping people's attention away from government actions. Programs like Social Security were implemented, inviting Americans to voluntarily act as charities for the US's new registered property and easy contracts, solidifying the plan by 1933.
Mass registration via US agencies led to officers enriching themselves through fraud without full disclosure.
By 1933, massive registration and surrender of property occurred through US agencies and state subdivisions. This ensured the enrichment of US officers, achieved without full disclosure of material facts accompanying each application. This is labeled as fraud.
The US government offered a remedy for fraud, absolving officers if people failed to use it, creating plausible deniability.
Fraud by US officers could lead to treason charges, but the government provided a remedy. If people failed to use this remedy, the officers would not be charged. This created plausible deniability, as they could claim ignorance. The US was not required to explain the remedy or its location, and even attorneys were not explicitly taught about it. If people discovered their remedy, the US had to honor it and release property back, but only if the remedy was requested properly.
Plausible deniability was maintained through complex laws and public education failures.
When people struggled with new laws, legislators could claim plausible deniability regarding intricate details. If people failed to use their remedy, the US always won. The US ensured people wouldn't find the remedy through politically correct textbooks in public schools and by passing laws that appeared to subject people to rules. Public media reinforced this by reporting 'politically correct' but incorrect news, making the existence of a remedy seem unlikely.
Despite challenges, some Americans discovered and used the remedy to regain freedom.
Many people sensed something was wrong with the conflicting laws and government school teachings. The question arose of how Americans could be free yet subject to government whims. Ultimately, some individuals proved resourceful enough to find the remedy.
House Joint Resolution 192 and the UCC Framework
HJR 192 (1933) acted as an insurance policy, codifying the right to discharge debt without using gold.
In 1933, the United States enacted House Joint Resolution 192 (HJR 192), codifying it in the Congressional Record and state statutes. This resolution provided the right to discharge any debt based on the absence of actual money in circulation. An executive order on April 5, 1933, paved the way for gold withdrawal. Representative Louis T. McFadden formally charged the Federal Reserve Board and Treasury officials with corruption on May 23, 1933.
HJR 192 protected legislators from fraud charges and removed the requirement for debt payment in gold.
HJR 192 served as an insurance policy, protecting legislators and officials from conviction for fraud or treason against the American people. It also protected the people from damages caused by government actions. McFadden was allegedly poisoned for his statements. HJR 192 dictated that the party with gold pays the bill, removed the obligation for US subjects/employees to pay debts with gold, prohibited gold clauses in future contracts, and retroactively canceled gold clauses in contracts before June 5, 1933. It allowed US subjects and employees to use any coin or currency to discharge public debt in the normal course of business, including fiat currency and promissory notes.
UCC filings establish value on bonds, allowing the creation of promissory notes against that value.
The purpose of filing a UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) is to establish a value on a bond, enabling the creation of promissory notes based on that bond's value. The UCC-1 financing statement is used for this purpose.
Federal Reserve notes are promissory notes with no inherent value, used to discharge debts.
Initially, US currency was used to discharge debts, but later, the Federal Reserve and US provided paper notes (Federal Reserve Notes) and debt instruments. These notes are used to discharge public debts. The Federal Reserve itself states these notes have no value; they are promissory notes, a promise to pay. If one is paid in these notes by their job or bank, they have never truly been paid, only promised payment.
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) unified procedures for handling commercial transactions and fictions.
In the 1950s, the UCC was introduced to states to unify generally accepted procedures for handling the new legal system of commercial transactions and fictions as if they were real. Security instruments, supported by presumptive contracts and debt instruments, could replace actual money. The need for money diminished as new forms of money (money of account created by bills of exchange) emerged. A uniform law system was required for commercial venues and courts to uphold these security instruments based on commercial fictions.
Commercial courts codified accepted procedures, shifting focus from substance to form and presumption.
The commercial court essentially codifies accepted and required procedures that all participants in commerce must follow. Principles of commerce shifted from substance to form in the 1900s, with presumption becoming a significant legal element. This shift supported the enforcement of commercial claims, as claimants wouldn't need to constantly prove their claims. The UCC principles combine dealing with substantive and presumptive commercial activities, applying equally to people and deceivers.
Registration transfers property ownership to the state, which holds titles and can exact taxes.
Individuals who register property, including cars, land, and even children, with subdivisions of the United States under duress, effectively surrender their claim to the substance. The United States or its states gain control of the substance and can impose use taxes. The states and the US hold the titles to all property, including children.
Profits from pledged registered property belong to the original owners, not the deceivers.
Property is the interest one has in a thing; the thing itself is primary. Profits from another's property belong to the owner of the thing. Deceivers profited by pledging registered property in commercial markets, but these profits belong to the owners (the people), not the deceivers. Corporations only show paper titles; substance cannot become fiction.
Profits from registered property must be in a constructive trust for the owner; commingling is fraud.
Profits derived from all registered 'things' must be placed in a constructive trust for the benefit of the owners. If profits are put into a general US fund instead of separate trusts, it constitutes fraud. Profits for each owner cannot be commingled. If an owner fails to utilize their remedy, fictional credits in a constructive trust remain for their benefit.
The owner is responsible for learning the law to access profits from their 'things' for debt discharge.
It is not the fault of deceivers if an owner fails to learn the law and access profits from their 'things' to discharge debts and charges against their public person. The owner is responsible for understanding the law to utilize these profits, which originated from the trust account funded by the US's gold.
The national debt is owed to the American people, representing the value of their registered property.
The national debt is not money owed to government officials but rather to the owners of registered property – the American people. A $30 trillion debt represents what is owed to Americans.
Debt is money; the issue is that people don't claim it or close the circuit for refunds.
The concept 'debt is money' is presented. The problem is that individuals are not claiming their rights or properly filing to close the circuit, thus preventing them from receiving refunds. Everyone is owed this money.
If the US owes a debt to the owner, the owner is presumed to owe a public debt to the US, to be discharged from the trust fund.
The dynamic is presented: if the United States owes a debt to the owner of a 'thing', the owner is presumed, by accommodation, to owe a public debt back to the United States. The logical step is for the US to discharge this public debt from the trust fund established for the owner.
The US claims owners cannot be principals if they act as accommodating parties for another person.
The US attempts to circumvent paying public debts for people by claiming an owner cannot be a principal if they agreed to be an accommodating party for a 'better person' (an artificial entity). If people are truly the principals, they need to understand how to handle their financial and political affairs, which they were seemingly never taught.
Ignorantly acting as an accommodating party creates debtor liability without consideration.
If an owner, through ignorance, acts as an accommodating party for a 'better person', they incur debtor liability without receiving consideration in return. This is another fiction where the owner doesn't need to knowingly agree to be the accommodating party; their actions suffice.
Presumption of being an accommodating party makes owners liable for taxes on property they truly own.
The presumption of being an accommodating party is strong enough for courts to hold the owner of a thing liable for taxes on property they actually own. Debtors might use certain things, but creditors (the original owners) master them.
The UCC specifies debtor duties; owners presumed debtors face difficulty convincing the US to discharge debts.
The UCC details debtor duties. If the owner is presumed a debtor due to prior admissions or adhesion contracts, convincing the US to discharge public debts for them becomes difficult. Additionally, courts are staffed with loyal judges who scrutinize people's attempts to use their remedy.
Filing a UCC financing statement establishes a superior claim over the 'artificial entity' or public person.
After learning the law, the 'quasi-owner' can file a UCC financing statement, supported by a security agreement, registering their security interest against the artificial entity (e.g., 'JOHN HENRY DOE', all caps) created by the state. This act is presented as reclaiming ownership from the state's paper title.
The UCC filing establishes priority over other claims on the same thing, challenging the government's authority.
The UCC and state commercial law specify that registered security interests have priority over other claims on the same thing. The missing evidence in court is the registered claim over a person's job. Filing the UCC provides proof of a superior claim over the all-caps entity, preventing the government from proceeding without committing a criminal act.
The owner must notify the Secretary of the Treasury of handling their own affairs via a chargeback process.
The owner must also notify the Secretary of the Treasury that they will handle their own affairs. This is accomplished through a chargeback process, which includes a private registered bond for investment filed with the Secretary of the Treasury (e.g., in Puerto Rico), per directives of an 'Order for Deposit Management and Investment'. A cover letter serves as courtesy notification.
The 'public person' (e.g., JOHN DOE) is a fictional entity needing to be 'charged' with energy via the owner's filings.
The public person, represented by the all-caps name (like 'JOHN DOE'), is a dead entity that can function within the public system of fictions. It has no power until 'charged' with energy by the owner. Filing a UCC financing statement essentially charges this entity and allows the owner to assert their rights.
Registering property means letting the US hold legal title based on misrepresentation and failure to disclose.
When an owner registered their 'thing' with the US or its subdivisions, they allowed the US to hold legal title based on misrepresentation and failure to disclose material facts. The owner likely retained possession, as the US invested the title and profited. If the owner didn't authorize the US to invest the title, profits belong to the owner due to retained equitable title.
Profits from invested titles must go into a trust for the owner, or it's fraud.
Legally, all profits from the investment of titles to registered 'things' must be placed in a fund for the owner's benefit. Failure to put profits into a trust fund constitutes fraud. Acquiring title through supposedly mandatory registration is itself fraud.
HJR 192 prevents treason charges against officers unless the remedy is unavailable to the people.
The scenario attributed to Mandell House is now fully applied to the US. Officers could be charged with treason if they hadn't provided a remedy. HJR 192 acts as an insurance policy against treason convictions, though charges can still be brought. Courts will dismiss cases ('failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted') if the remedy exists and is accessible.
The UCC and related concepts offer a legitimate remedy outside of traditional court proceedings.
The person bringing a charge must also provide the remedy. While US courts might appear to ignore remedies, an alternative remedy exists outside the court system. Failure to use the remedy prevents treason charges, but tort claims (like breach of trust) may still apply.
The UCC, promissory notes, and bonds are real tools for private banking and debt discharge.
The video concludes by emphasizing that the UCC, promissory notes, and bonds are real instruments. 'Private banking' is presented as a legitimate method for individuals to manage their affairs and discharge debts using these tools.
Ask a Question
*Uses 1 Wisdom coin from your coin balance