Notice of Void Judgement
Summary
This video explains how to challenge the jurisdiction of administrative law judges (ALJs), commissioners, and magistrates, arguing they often act as clerks for administrative agencies rather than true judicial officers. It details how to use legal precedent and specific wording in documents to declare judgments void due to lack of jurisdiction. The core argument is that these officials, when enforcing statutes, are ministerial agents, not judges, and any actions taken without proven jurisdiction or a valid contract are nullities. The presentation provides a template and legal references to support these claims in court challenges.
Key Insights
Judges enforcing administrative law act as ministerial clerks, not judicial officers.
When a judge deals with statutes (state government code, penal code, civil procedure), they are functioning as a clerk for the prosecutor or administrative agency. This is supported by legal texts like Casey Davis's 'Administrative Law Chapter 1'.
Acting as a clerk instead of a judge renders judicial actions null.
If a judge is operating as a clerk, any judicial actions they attempt are considered a nullity (invalid). This principle is cited from 'Burns v. Superior Court'.
Jurisdiction must be proven once challenged, typically requiring a contract.
Once jurisdiction is challenged, the burden is on the other party to prove it. This proof usually requires establishing a contractual nexus with the state, such as voluntary licensing.
Sections
Introduction to Challenging Authority
Administrative law judges (ALJs), clerks, and magistrates are often not real judges.
The speaker emphasizes that individuals in positions like ALJs, clerks, commissioners, or magistrates in Salt Lake are referred to as 'fake judges' and are not truly judicial officers. The video promises to explore court cases and precedent to support this argument.
Proper documentation and mailing are crucial for proving service.
It is important to use certified mail and record the certified mail number in documents. This serves as proof of mailing, especially when dealing with entities that may ignore correspondence.
Multiple attempts to obtain validation are necessary before escalating.
Send specialized documents like 'special appearance validation of debt' letters and 'void judgments' letters. The speaker suggests using Federal Rules of Civil Procedure but anticipates these will be ignored. The 'Wizard of Oz' analogy implies three attempts are possible before taking legal action.
Failure to verify debt or provide documentation can lead to dismissal.
If authorities ignore requests for documentation and validation after multiple attempts, one should be able to seek dismissal in small claims or municipal court.
Document structure includes sender and recipient information with case details.
A document should clearly state the sender's name, address, and contact information, as well as the recipient's mailing address and info. It must also include the case number and judge's name, along with the attempt number for tracking purposes.
Documents can be titled as motions to dismiss, vacate, or judicial notice.
Legal documents can be titled as 'motion to dismiss,' 'motion to vacate,' 'judicial notice,' or specifically 'notice of void judgment.' These titles assert the nature of the challenge.
A 'living man' or 'woman' is distinct from a state-created corporation.
When making a declaration, identify yourself as 'a man living well' or 'a woman living on the land without the corporation called the state of [your state].' This establishes a non-corporate identity.
Judges enforcing administrative law act as ministerial clerks, not judicial officers.
When a judge deals with statutes (state government code, penal code, civil procedure), they are functioning as a clerk for the prosecutor or administrative agency. This is supported by legal texts like Casey Davis's 'Administrative Law Chapter 1'.
Acting as a clerk instead of a judge renders judicial actions null.
If a judge is operating as a clerk, any judicial actions they attempt are considered a nullity (invalid). This principle is cited from 'Burns v. Superior Court'.
Jurisdiction and Contractual Basis
Jurisdiction must be proven once challenged, typically requiring a contract.
Once jurisdiction is challenged, the burden is on the other party to prove it. This proof usually requires establishing a contractual nexus with the state, such as voluntary licensing.
State corporations lack standing to sue as they are legal fictions without rights.
The speaker argues that state entities like 'the state of New York' or 'state of Utah' are fictions of the mind, not natural persons, and therefore lack standing to bring cases or hold a man or woman in court. This is based on legal interpretations of corporate entities.
Judges are prohibited from substituting their judgment for agency decisions.
Courts are restricted from substituting their own evidence, testimony, or rationale for that of an administrative agency. This implies they cannot act independently if they are part of the same system.
An unconstitutional act confers no rights, duties, or protections.
Citing 'Shelby v. Norton,' an unconstitutional act is legally void, imposing no obligations and affording no protection. It is treated as if it never existed. Actions based on such acts are therefore invalid.
Judges acting without jurisdiction are engaging in treason and are personally liable.
When a judge acts outside their jurisdiction, it constitutes treason. They lose immunity and can be sued personally for their actions, especially if they use 'invisible contracts' to 'enslave' individuals. Their decisions are considered 'brutum fulmen' – empty noise.
A neutral and detached judge is a fundamental right, often absent in these cases.
Parties have a right to a neutral and detached judge. The speaker argues that officials paid by the state are not neutral, thus making their decisions void. Conspiring with agencies constitutes fraud.
Corporate codes and statutes cannot be used to assault or enslave individuals.
Individuals should reject participation in commercial transactions imposed by the state. Their use of corporate codes against a 'living man' is seen as an assault, and the official's decision is void.
Void judgments are absolute nullities from inception, having no legal effect.
Referring to case law ('City of Lufkin v. McVicker', 'Thompson v. Thompson'), void judgments are described as complete nullities from the beginning, legally ineffectual, and attackable at any time. They can be attacked directly or collaterally.
A judge acting outside the law loses subject-matter jurisdiction, rendering orders void.
If a judge does not follow the law, they are acting as a trespasser and lose subject-matter jurisdiction. Any orders issued in such a state are void.
Legal Maxims and Practical Application
Fraudulent or unconstitutional actions create no valid legal basis or obligation.
Maxims of law state that 'out of fraud no action arises' and 'void from the beginning cannot be made valid by subsequent acts.' An unconstitutional act is void and cannot be enforced.
'PIG' is an acronym for 'Persons In Government' involved in illegal actions.
The term 'PIG' is defined as an acronym for 'Persons In Government' who allegedly steal money for personal gain. Actions by these individuals or administrative judges are characterized as fraud, deceit, and criminal.
Silence can constitute fraud when there is a duty to speak or disclose.
Fraud can arise from silence when there's a duty to disclose information, such as the nature of contracts or the lack of judicial capacity of officials.
Questioning officials about their judicial capacity and contract basis is advised.
Directly ask officials if they are real judges, if you've surrendered rights through contracts, or if they can prove their company's interest in your property or seize it without a warrant.
Proper signature format and zip code usage are critical for jurisdiction.
Sign documents as 'living soul' ('LS') and use your zip code in brackets. Not using brackets implies acceptance of federal jurisdiction. This is to avoid admitting federal jurisdiction.
Notarization of documents is required to validate signatures.
Signatures on these documents must be made in front of a notary and then notarized to be considered valid.
Ask a Question
*Uses 1 Wisdom coin from your coin balance
