Summary
This video argues that US citizenship is actually corporate citizenship, tied to a contractual agreement rather than birthright. It claims the IRS and Federal Reserve are private entities controlling a system where citizens are treated as artificial persons or corporations, evidenced by all-caps names on official documents. It further posits that Social Security is a welfare program, not earned benefits, requiring individuals to admit incapacity and implicitly pledge to cover the national debt, functioning as a disguised Ponzi scheme.
Key Insights
U.S. citizenship is evidence of corporate citizenship and control.
There is abundant evidence suggesting U.S. citizenship is actually corporate citizenship, placing individuals under the control of private businesses like the IRS. This is supported by the official list of expatriates including corporations, indicating they can renounce U.S. citizenship, implying they once held it.
U.S. citizenship is based on contract, not birthright.
In court, it has been confirmed that U.S. citizenship is based on contract rather than the place of birth. This leads to the conclusion that there are two types of citizenship: American (held by natural-born individuals) and U.S. (a corporate, contract-based citizenship).
Social Security was devised to saddle Americans with debt responsibility.
Following a declared bankruptcy, President Roosevelt contracted with international bankers, who allegedly caused the bankruptcy through gold manipulation. The Social Security system and its payroll taxes were then created as a means to impose joint responsibility on Americans for the trillions in interest charges generated by this perceived treachery.
Applying for Social Security is an admission of incompetence and need for government guardianship.
The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Helvering v. Davis (1937) classified Social Security as a form of welfare. Consequently, applying for and using a Social Security number is seen as a tacit confession of incompetence in managing personal affairs, necessitating the U.S. government's appointment as a guardian for welfare program eligibility, similar to being a ward of the state.
Sections
Corporate Citizenship and U.S. Accountability
The U.S. government became a for-profit municipal corporation on February 21, 1871.
Two and a half years after the Act of July 27, 1868, the U.S. government transitioned into operating as a for-profit municipal corporation on February 21, 1871. This followed the War of 1812, which the speaker cryptically links to mud floods and war crimes.
The IRS is a commercial business domiciled in Puerto Rico.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is presented as a commercial business, not a government agency, whose primary expenses are postage and rent, which government agencies typically do not pay. It's described as an intelligence gathering, accounting, and collection agency for the private Federal Reserve, domiciled in Puerto Rico under the Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico, who also holds positions at the World Bank and IMF.
U.S. citizenship is evidence of corporate citizenship and control.
There is abundant evidence suggesting U.S. citizenship is actually corporate citizenship, placing individuals under the control of private businesses like the IRS. This is supported by the official list of expatriates including corporations, indicating they can renounce U.S. citizenship, implying they once held it.
Corporations are designated with all-caps names, distinct from human names.
Official documents like passports and driver's licenses often use all-caps for names, which is the standard method for designating corporations and corporately colored entities. This practice deviates from English grammar for proper names of individuals, signifying an artificial person.
U.S. citizenship is based on contract, not birthright.
In court, it has been confirmed that U.S. citizenship is based on contract rather than the place of birth. This leads to the conclusion that there are two types of citizenship: American (held by natural-born individuals) and U.S. (a corporate, contract-based citizenship).
The Nature of Social Security
Social Security is a primary method for the U.S. to contract with customers via payroll taxes.
Social Security, funded by payroll taxes, serves as a primary mechanism for the United States to enter into contracts with its citizens. These taxes are levied to cover the debt owed to the private Federal Reserve Bank.
Social Security was devised to saddle Americans with debt responsibility.
Following a declared bankruptcy, President Roosevelt contracted with international bankers, who allegedly caused the bankruptcy through gold manipulation. The Social Security system and its payroll taxes were then created as a means to impose joint responsibility on Americans for the trillions in interest charges generated by this perceived treachery.
Applying for Social Security is an admission of incompetence and need for government guardianship.
The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Helvering v. Davis (1937) classified Social Security as a form of welfare. Consequently, applying for and using a Social Security number is seen as a tacit confession of incompetence in managing personal affairs, necessitating the U.S. government's appointment as a guardian for welfare program eligibility, similar to being a ward of the state.
Social Security is a welfare program, not earned benefits with vested rights.
Accepting Social Security benefits is framed as acquiring a legal right to state protection in exchange for a tacit promise to contribute to paying off U.S. government debt. The Supreme Court case Fleming v. Nestor (1960) implies benefits are not guaranteed and can be adjusted or denied, suggesting no vested property rights exist.
The Social Security system is a Ponzi scheme, offering no guaranteed recovery of contributions.
The Social Security system is described as a Ponzi scheme where current contributions fund current benefits, but there's no guarantee of recovering the full amount paid in. Mathematical impossibility of paying off the national debt is cited, as the Federal Reserve lends money it creates and charges interest, making the debt theoretically unpayable.
FICA taxes are mislabeled; 'insurance' covers federal debt, 'contributions' imply reimbursement for debt payment.
The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) is misleading. The 'insurance' aspect refers to insuring the federal government's debt to the Federal Reserve, not providing actual insurance to the taxpayer. 'Contributions' in legal terms refer to a debtor's right to seek reimbursement from co-debtors for paying more than their share. Thus, FICA taxes are not premiums for insurance but a contribution towards the national debt.
Taxation on labor is illegal; income is profits from investments, not wages.
The speaker asserts that income is defined as profits from stocks, bonds, or investments. Wages earned from labor are considered private contracts that cannot be legally taxed. The voluntary payment of taxes on labor is viewed as complicity in a form of 'voluntary slavery'.
Social Security offers no rights, only privileges granted by the system.
Contracting with these entities, including the Social Security system, results in the loss of inherent rights and the acquisition of mere privileges. The system's structure, legally and contractually, means it is not obligated to compensate retirees for their FICA payments, which are presented as contributions to the national debt.
Ask a Question
*Uses 1 Wisdom coin from your coin balance